BETAPlatform preview · Product capabilities are under development.
Skip to content
CLAUDE SOURCE / BETA REVIEWCompare all six variants ↗
LINKIO

Landing experiments

Three concepts for LINKIO.ONE, each aimed at a different audience with a different hypothesis and a different primary action. Internal comparison page — not linked from anywhere public.

These three are not an A/B test of each other.

They address different audiences with different offers, so their conversion rates are not comparable and should never be reported side by side as a winner. Each page is judged against its own metric, and only a variant of the same page against the same audience is a valid test.

One Touch

/claude/one-touch

Audience
Founders, operators, technology partners
Hypothesis
A single interface for coordinating agents and business processes creates interest in the platform itself.
Primary action
Request Early Access
Primary metric
Share of visitors who submit the “What would you connect first?” answer, with a usable answer
Supporting signals
Scroll depth to the control section; interaction rate on the orchestration diagram
Visual direction
Navy hero, interactive four-stage flow, light explanatory sections
Source documents
Investor Deck 4.0 (one touch sequence), Brand Kit v1.1 (positioning, trust layers, voice)
Open One Touch

AI CFO

/claude/ai-cfo

Audience
E-commerce and Shopify owners, especially cash on delivery
Hypothesis
A concrete reconciliation problem creates willingness to discuss a pilot.
Primary action
Apply for an AI CFO Pilot
Primary metric
Pilot applications that name a specific, checkable problem in the free-text field
Supporting signals
Rows opened in the reconciliation walk-through; reach of the honest-status section
Visual direction
Light base, navy money-state panels, readable tables and statuses
Source documents
Partner deck v2 (COD exception, module readiness), Implementation plan (what works today), Brand Kit v1.1 (money states)
Open AI CFO

Investors & Partners

/claude/investors

Audience
Pre-seed investors, fintech partners, integrators
Hypothesis
A working internal workflow plus a transparent path to commercialisation produces qualified inbound.
Primary action
Request the Investor Brief
Primary metric
Brief requests from named funds or operating partners, judged on quality not count
Supporting signals
Reach of the milestone-gates section before the form
Visual direction
Editorial, white, navy and blue accents, architecture and gates
Source documents
Investor Deck 4.0 (architecture, gates, boundaries), Implementation plan (status discipline)
Open Investors & Partners

Constraints applied to all three

  • No paying customers, confirmed revenue, completed security assessment or multi-tenant platform is claimed.
  • PetsChoice.Club appears only as a proving ground, never as an external customer.
  • No guaranteed saving, return or investment outcome anywhere.
  • Roadmap is never presented as finished work; status is marked working / preview / roadmap.
  • No technology logo is shown as a confirmed partnership.
  • No production API, financial data, secret or live worker is connected.
  • Forms are UI only: local validation, nothing sent, nothing stored, no false success message.
  • Every page carries noindex and a Beta marker; no external tracking is included.